NRIC Numbers Can No Longer Be Used for Authentication in Singapore: What Organizations Must Do Before 31 December 2026 - Privacy Trust

Protecting Privacy Build Trust

Written by Abdullah Akram February 14, 2026

NRIC Numbers Can No Longer Be Used for Authentication in Singapore: What Organisations Must Do Before 31 December 2026

Introduction

Data protection and cybersecurity standards in Singapore continue to evolve as digital risks increase and regulatory expectations become more stringent. In January 2026, the Personal Data Protection Commission issued a clear directive that affects all private sector organisations operating in Singapore. By 31 December 2026, organisations must cease using NRIC numbers for authentication purposes.

This announcement is not a new concept but a firm regulatory deadline. It reinforces the long-standing principle that NRIC numbers are identifiers, not security credentials. Despite earlier advisories, many organisations still rely on NRIC numbers for login, verification, or access control. This practice now carries significant compliance and enforcement risks.

This article explains what the PDPC requirement means, why NRIC numbers are no longer acceptable for authentication, what organisations must do to comply, and how businesses can future-proof their authentication practices while meeting PDPA obligations.

Understanding the PDPC Requirement on NRIC Authentication

The PDPC has made it clear that organisations must stop using NRIC numbers as authentication information, whether in full or in part. Authentication refers to any process used to confirm a user’s identity before granting access to systems, services, or personal data.

This includes, but is not limited to:

- Using NRIC numbers as usernames or login IDs
- Using NRIC numbers as passwords or default PINs
- Using partial NRIC numbers combined with other personal data
- Using NRIC numbers as verification codes or security questions

Any authentication process that relies on NRIC numbers is considered insecure and non-compliant under current PDPC expectations.

Organisations that continue such practices beyond the deadline may be found in breach of the Personal Data Protection Act, particularly the obligation to make reasonable security arrangements to protect personal data

Why NRIC Numbers Were Commonly Used in the Past

Historically, NRIC numbers were widely used by organisations because they provided a unique and consistent way to identify individuals. Many legacy systems were designed at a time when cybersecurity threats were less sophisticated and regulatory scrutiny was lower.

In sectors such as finance, healthcare, education, and membership-based services, NRIC numbers became a convenient reference point. Over time, this convenience led to misuse, where NRIC numbers were treated as authentication credentials rather than identifiers.

The PDPC’s directive acknowledges that while NRIC numbers may still be collected or used for identification in permitted circumstances, they must never be used as a security control.

Why NRIC Numbers Are Not Suitable for Authentication

NRIC Numbers Are Static Identifiers

NRIC numbers do not change. Once compromised, they remain exposed permanently. Unlike passwords, they cannot be easily reset or replaced.

NRIC Numbers Are Widely Shared

Individuals often provide their NRIC numbers to multiple organisations. This increases the risk of unauthorised access if the number is reused as an authentication factor.

NRIC Numbers Do Not Meet Modern Security Standards

Modern authentication relies on layered security, dynamic credentials, and risk-based access controls. NRIC numbers do not meet these standards and are vulnerable to misuse.Accordingly, the PDPC has stated that using NRIC numbers for authentication would constitute an unreasonable security practice under the PDPA.

Legal and Regulatory Basis Under the PDPA

The PDPA requires organisations to implement reasonable security arrangements to protect personal data in their possession or control. This obligation applies regardless of organisation size or industry.

Using NRIC numbers for authentication may be considered a failure to implement reasonable security measures, especially given repeated PDPC guidance and public advisories.

Once the enforcement phase begins in 2027, organisations will no longer be able to rely on ignorance or legacy systems as a defence.

Compliance Timeline and Enforcement Expectations

Key Deadline

All organisations must stop using NRIC numbers for authentication by 31 December 2026.

Enforcement From 1 January 2027

From 1 January 2027, the PDPC may take enforcement action against non-compliant organisations. This may include:

- Regulatory directions to remediate systems
- Warnings or compliance notices
- Financial penalties depending on the severity and impact

Early compliance significantly reduces regulatory and reputational risk.

How Organisations Should Prepare for Compliance

Step 1: Identify NRIC Usage Across Systems

Conduct a full review of all digital and physical systems where NRIC numbers are used for authentication. This includes websites, mobile apps, internal systems, and third-party platforms.

Step 2: Assess Security Risks

Evaluate how NRIC numbers are stored, processed, and accessed. Identify high-risk areas where unauthorised access could lead to significant data exposure.

Step 3: Replace NRIC-Based Authentication

Implement secure alternatives such as:Strong password policies Multi-factor authentication One-time passwords Hardware or software security tokens Biometric authentication where appropriate

Step 4: Update Policies and Documentation

Ensure privacy policies, internal procedures, and system documentation reflect the updated authentication approach.

Step 5: Train Employees and Administrators

Staff must understand why NRIC numbers cannot be used for authentication and how to apply secure alternatives consistently.

Acceptable Uses of NRIC Numbers After 2026

The PDPC has not banned the collection or use of NRIC numbers entirely. NRIC numbers may still be used for identification or verification where permitted by law or required for legitimate business purposes.

However, the key distinction remains clear. NRIC numbers must not be used as authentication credentials or security controls.

Business Impact of Non-Compliance

Failing to comply with the PDPC requirement can lead to more than regulatory penalties. Organisations may face:Loss of customer trust Reputational damage Increased exposure to data breaches Operational disruptions during forced remediationProactive compliance allows organisations to avoid these risks while strengthening their overall security posture.

Building Trust Through Secure Authentication

Modern customers and partners expect organisations to protect personal data responsibly. Moving away from NRIC-based authentication is not just a compliance exercise. It is a trust-building measure.

Strong authentication practices demonstrate accountability, professionalism, and a commitment to data protection.

How Privacy Trust Supports Organisations

Privacy Trust works with organisations across industries to strengthen privacy and security practices in line with PDPC expectations.

Our services include PDPA gap assessments, authentication reviews, risk assessments, and implementation support for secure access controls. We help organisations transition away from NRIC-based authentication while maintaining operational efficiency.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can organizations still collect NRIC numbers in Singapore?

Yes. NRIC numbers may still be collected where permitted under PDPC guidelines. The restriction applies to their use for authentication, not identification.

Is it illegal to use NRIC numbers for login after 2026?

Yes. Using NRIC numbers for authentication after 31 December 2026 may result in enforcement action under the PDPA.

What is considered authentication under PDPC rules?

Authentication includes any process used to verify identity before granting access, such as login credentials, verification codes, or security questions.

Can partial NRIC numbers be used for authentication?

No. Using partial NRIC numbers combined with other personal data is also prohibited.

What are acceptable alternatives to NRIC-based authentication?

Acceptable alternatives include strong passwords, multi-factor authentication, one-time passwords, security tokens, and biometric authentication.

Do small businesses need to comply?

Yes. The PDPA applies to all private sector organisations regardless of size.

How long does it take to replace NRIC-based authentication?

The timeline depends on system complexity. Early planning ensures a smoother transition before the deadline.